Marie Mettraux vs Georgina Groth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Groth has demonstrated stronger recent form, winning 46.2% of points on their second serve compared to Mettraux's 30.89%. Can second serve performance impact match outcomes? It often does, providing Groth a potential advantage.
• Return game stats: Groth excelled by winning 48.78% of opponents' second serve points, while Mettraux managed 44.07%. Interestingly, Mettraux surpassed Groth in returning first serves, winning 38.88% against Groth's 31.4%.
• Under pressure: Mettraux has been more effective in saving breakpoints, achieving a 50.37% success rate, overriding Groth's 43.1%.
• Overall performance: Groth has maintained a slightly better match win rate over the last year at 58.97% compared to Mettraux's 53.49% (both have equal victories, but Groth has fewer losses).
• Surface preference: Groth prefers hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Mettraux favors clay, despite winning just 48% on that surface. How might surface preference dictate the match? If played on a hard court, Groth's chances could be stronger.
• Player level: Groth has outperformed at the Futures/Satellites level, winning 67.86% of matches, while Mettraux achieved 58.33% success
.
• Quality of opponents: Groth has faced tougher competition, with opponents ranked on average 148.33, in contrast to Mettraux's 405.16. Could facing higher-ranked opponents influence Groth's competitiveness in this match?
• Deciding set performance: Groth and Mettraux have similar rates in deciding set victories, with Groth at 50% and Mettraux at 45%.
• Break point conversion: Groth has converted 47.06% of break point opportunities recently, compared to Mettraux's 42.5%.
• Event specifics: Factor in current event performance and historical performance at specific events to analyze the match's outcome. This could change the prediction based on current form.

Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):

Assessing the comparative statistics between Groth and Mettraux offers a multifaceted understanding of their respective strengths and areas for improvement. Notably, Groth's more aggressive second service game and superior opponent quality signal a formidable competitive edge.

While Mettraux's resilience under breakpoint pressure is commendable, Groth's stronger overall performance record and advantageous preference for hard courts position them favorably, especially if the match takes place on this surface.

Considering these factors in conjunction with their respective historical data, Groth appears the likely victor in the forthcoming match.